Heat Transfer · Chapter 6 of 10 · Intermediate
Forced Convection
A pump or fan drives the flow, and a correlation gives the coefficient. Pipe flow and cross-flow cover most of what a mechanical engineer cools or heats.
Readiness check
From Chapter 5. Tick only what you can do closed-notes.
- Compute Re, Pr, and Nu for a flow.
- Convert Nu to h with h = Nu·k/L.
- Decide laminar versus turbulent from Re.
- Evaluate fluid properties at a mean temperature.
- Raise numbers to fractional powers reliably.
The core idea
Match the geometry and regime to a tested correlation, and it hands you Nu, then h.
ReD = VD/νNu = 0.023 Re0.8Prnh = Nu·k/DForced convection splits into internal flow (inside pipes and ducts) and external flow (over surfaces, cylinders, and tube banks). Each has its own family of correlations, validated by experiment. The job is to pick the right one, evaluate properties correctly, and read off h.
The skills, taught in order
Forced convection is correlation-driven. Learn the two geometry families, the handful of correlations that cover most cases, and the discipline of evaluating them correctly.
6.1 Internal versus external flow
Internal flow is bounded by walls (pipes, ducts, channels) and the fluid eventually fills the cross-section. External flow is over an exposed body (a plate, cylinder, or tube bank) where the boundary layer is free to grow and separate. The two need different correlations.
6.2 The entry region and fully developed flow
Near a pipe inlet the boundary layers are still growing and h is high; once they merge, the flow is fully developed and h settles to a constant. Use the hydraulic diameter Dh = 4Ac/P for non-circular ducts.
6.3 Laminar pipe flow
A surprise: for fully developed laminar pipe flow, Nu is a constant, not a function of Re. It is 3.66 for a constant wall temperature and 4.36 for a constant wall heat flux. Laminar pipe flow is therefore a weak convector regardless of speed.
6.4 Turbulent pipe flow
Once Re > about 2300 (fully turbulent by ~10⁴), the Dittus-Boelter correlation applies: Nu = 0.023 Re0.8Prn, with n = 0.4 when the fluid is being heated and 0.3 when cooled. Turbulent pipe flow gives high coefficients, which is why heat exchangers run turbulent.
| Pipe flow | Nusselt number |
|---|---|
| Laminar, constant wall temperature | Nu = 3.66 |
| Laminar, constant wall heat flux | Nu = 4.36 |
| Turbulent (Dittus-Boelter) | Nu = 0.023 Re0.8Prn |
6.5 External cross-flow
For flow across a cylinder (a pipe in wind, a wire, a tube in a bank), the Hilpert correlation Nu = C Rem Pr1/3 uses constants C and m that depend on the Reynolds range. The boundary layer separates, leaving a turbulent wake that complicates the picture but the correlation captures it.
| ReD range | C | m |
|---|---|---|
| 40 to 4000 | 0.683 | 0.466 |
| 4000 to 40 000 | 0.193 | 0.618 |
| 40 000 to 400 000 | 0.027 | 0.805 |
6.6 Choosing and applying a correlation
The procedure never changes: identify internal or external, compute Re, confirm the regime and that it falls in the correlation's valid range, evaluate properties at the mean temperature, then compute Nu and h = Nu·k/D. Reporting which correlation you used is part of the answer.
Engineering connection: pipe and duct cooling, the tube-side and shell-side coefficients of the heat exchangers in Chapter 9, and the h that fins and transient parts depend on.
Worked example 1: water in a pipe
Water at a mean temperature where ν = 8.0×10⁻⁷ m²/s, k = 0.62 W/m·K, and Pr = 5.4 flows at 2.0 m/s through a 20 mm pipe and is being heated. Find the convection coefficient on the pipe wall.
- ProblemFind the wall convection coefficient for the pipe flow in Figure 1.
- Given / findV = 2.0 m/s, D = 0.020 m, ν = 8.0×10⁻⁷, k = 0.62, Pr = 5.4, fluid heated. Find h.
- AssumptionsFully developed turbulent flow, smooth pipe, properties at the bulk mean temperature.
- ModelCompute ReD, confirm turbulent, apply Dittus-Boelter with n = 0.4 (heating), then h = Nu·k/D.
- EquationsReD = VD/ν Nu = 0.023 Re0.8Pr0.4 h = Nu·k/D
- SolveReD = 2.0 × 0.020 / 8.0×10⁻⁷ = 50 000 (turbulent). Nu = 0.023 × 500000.8 × 5.40.4 = 0.023 × 5740 × 1.96 = 259. h = 259 × 0.62 / 0.020 = 8000 W/m²·K.
- CheckEight thousand W/m²·K is squarely in the forced-liquid range (100 to 20 000) from Chapter 1, far above any gas. Water's high k and turbulent mixing are doing the work; the same flow in laminar regime would give only Nu = 3.66.
- ConclusionLiquids in turbulent pipe flow are excellent convectors, which is why water cooling beats air cooling so decisively. This wall coefficient is exactly the tube-side h that Chapter 9 feeds into an overall U.
Worked example 2: wind across a pipe
Air at 20 m/s blows across a 25 mm outdoor pipe. With air properties ν = 1.6×10⁻⁵ m²/s, k = 0.026 W/m·K, Pr = 0.71, find the convection coefficient on the pipe using the Hilpert cross-flow correlation.
- ProblemFind the convection coefficient for air in cross-flow over the pipe in Figure 2.
- Given / findV = 20 m/s, D = 0.025 m, ν = 1.6×10⁻⁵, k = 0.026, Pr = 0.71. Find h.
- AssumptionsSteady cross-flow, isolated cylinder, properties at the film temperature.
- ModelCompute ReD, read the Hilpert constants for that range, apply Nu = C Rem Pr1/3, then h = Nu·k/D.
- EquationsReD = VD/ν Nu = C Rem Pr1/3 h = Nu·k/D
- SolveReD = 20 × 0.025 / 1.6×10⁻⁵ = 31 250, in the 4000 to 40 000 band, so C = 0.193, m = 0.618. Nu = 0.193 × 312500.618 × 0.711/3 = 103. h = 103 × 0.026 / 0.025 = 107 W/m²·K.
- CheckOne hundred W/m²·K is a strong forced-gas value, well above the still-air figure of Chapter 1, yet far below the water pipe (8000). Gases convect far less than liquids even when driven hard, because of their low k.
- ConclusionEven a 20 m/s wind gives only about 107 W/m²·K on a bare pipe, which is why outdoor pipes are lagged and why air-cooled equipment leans on fins to make up for air's poor convection.
Misconceptions and diagnostics
| Mistake | Symptom | Diagnostic question | Correction |
|---|---|---|---|
| Internal correlation on external flow | Dittus-Boelter used for a pipe in wind | "Is the fluid inside the pipe or across it?" | Internal and external flows use different correlations; pick by where the fluid is. |
| Dittus-Boelter in laminar flow | Re0.8 applied below Re ≈ 2300 | "Is the pipe flow turbulent?" | Laminar pipe flow has constant Nu (3.66 or 4.36); the turbulent correlation does not apply. |
| Wrong Hilpert band | C and m taken from the wrong Re range | "Which Reynolds band am I in?" | Read C and m from the band containing your Re; they change the result a lot. |
| Diameter dropped from Re or h | Re or h off by orders of magnitude | "Did I use D in both Re and Nu·k/D?" | Use the diameter consistently: Re = VD/ν and h = Nu·k/D. |
Practice ladder
Air (ν = 1.6×10⁻⁵, k = 0.026, Pr = 0.71) flows at 8 m/s through a 30 mm duct and is heated. Find Re and h with Dittus-Boelter.
Show answer
Re = 8 × 0.030 / 1.6×10⁻⁵ = 15 000 (turbulent). Nu = 0.023 × 150000.8 × 0.710.4 = 0.023 × 2190 × 0.873 = 44. h = 44 × 0.026 / 0.030 = 38 W/m²·K. Air in a duct gives a modest coefficient even when turbulent.
The Worked Example 1 water flow drops to 0.2 m/s, giving Re = 5000. Is Dittus-Boelter still the right tool, and how does h compare?
Show answer
Re = 5000 is just turbulent, so Dittus-Boelter still applies but is least accurate near transition. Nu = 0.023 × 50000.8 × 5.40.4 ≈ 43, h ≈ 1340 W/m²·K, about a sixth of the 2 m/s value, since h scales with Re0.8.
Compare cooling a 25 mm pipe by 20 m/s air (Worked Example 2, h ≈ 107) versus filling it with the 2 m/s water of Worked Example 1 (h ≈ 8000). For the same wall area and temperature difference, what is the ratio of heat removed, and what does that say about coolant choice?
Show answer
q = hA ΔT, so the ratio is just the h ratio, about 8000/107 ≈ 75. Internal water removes roughly 75 times the heat of external air for the same area and ΔT. This is why high-power systems use liquid loops rather than air.
Estimate h for a real forced-convection case you can observe (water in a hose, air in a duct, a fan over a radiator). Identify internal or external, compute Re, choose a correlation, and report h with its regime.
What good work looks like
Internal-versus-external stated, Re with the regime, the named correlation and its valid range, properties at the mean temperature, and h with a sanity check against Chapter 1's ranges.
Working with AI, and proving it yourself
Use AI as an examiner, not a solver
Portfolio task
Write a one-page "Correlation Card": the pipe-flow and cross-flow correlations with their valid ranges, and two worked cases (one internal, one external) taken from flow conditions to h.
Retrieval and spaced review
Closed notes. Answer out loud, then reveal.
1. What distinguishes internal from external flow?
Internal flow is bounded by walls and fills the cross-section; external flow is over an exposed body with a free, separating boundary layer.
2. Write the Nusselt number for laminar pipe flow.
Constant: 3.66 for constant wall temperature, 4.36 for constant heat flux, independent of Re.
3. State the Dittus-Boelter correlation.
Nu = 0.023 Re0.8Prn, n = 0.4 heating, 0.3 cooling, for turbulent pipe flow.
4. What form does cross-flow over a cylinder take?
Nu = C Rem Pr1/3, with C and m set by the Reynolds band (Hilpert).
5. Why does water cool far better than air?
Higher k and higher Pr give a larger Nu and a much larger h = Nu·k/D, often by one to two orders of magnitude.
Textbook mapping
| Item | Mapping |
|---|---|
| Primary source | Lienhard and Lienhard, A Heat Transfer Textbook (6th ed), Chapter 7 (forced convection in a variety of configurations) |
| Cross-reference | Incropera, Ch. 7 to 8 (external and internal flow) · Çengel and Ghajar, Ch. 7 to 8 |
| Core topics | 6.1 Internal vs external · 6.2 Entry region · 6.3 Laminar pipe Nu · 6.4 Dittus-Boelter · 6.5 Cross-flow · 6.6 Applying correlations |
| Engineering connection | Pipe and duct cooling, and the tube-side and shell-side coefficients of Chapter 9. |
| Read next | Chapter 7: Natural Convection. |