Finite Element Methods · Chapter 4 of 10 · Advanced
Beam Elements
A beam node carries a deflection and a rotation, so the element grows to a 4-by-4 stiffness matrix. Built from the cubic deflection of bending, a single element reproduces the cantilever exactly.
Readiness check
This chapter adds bending degrees of freedom. Tick only what you can do closed-notes.
- Recall beam bending and EI.
- Recall the cantilever deflection PL³/3EI.
- Multiply a 2-by-2 matrix by a vector.
- Distinguish a deflection from a rotation (slope).
- Apply a fixed (clamped) boundary condition.
The core idea
Each beam node has two degrees of freedom, a transverse deflection and a rotation, so a two-node element has four. Its 4-by-4 stiffness, built from the cubic bending shape, exactly captures end loads.
DOF: v₁, θ₁, v₂, θ₂k entries: 12EI/L³, 6EI/L², 4EI/L, 2EI/Lcantilever: δ = PL³/3EI, θ = PL²/2EIBending links a transverse load not only to deflection but to slope, so each beam node carries two degrees of freedom: a transverse displacement v and a rotation θ. A two-node beam element therefore has a 4-by-4 stiffness matrix, whose entries 12EI/L³, 6EI/L², 4EI/L, and 2EI/L come from integrating the cubic deflection that Euler-Bernoulli bending predicts. Because that cubic is the exact deformed shape for end loads and moments, a single beam element reproduces the classic cantilever result δ = PL³/3EI exactly, with no mesh refinement needed. Assembling beam elements and recovering moments and shear gives the full bending response of a frame.
The skills, taught in order
Five skills set the beam degrees of freedom, the stiffness matrix, assembly, the cantilever solution, and recovery.
4.1 Beam degrees of freedom
Bending couples force to both deflection and slope, so each node has two degrees of freedom: a transverse displacement v and a rotation θ. The element's four DOF are v₁, θ₁, v₂, θ₂, and its stiffness matrix is 4-by-4.
4.2 The beam stiffness matrix
Integrating the cubic Hermite shape functions over the element gives the stiffness entries: 12EI/L³ couples the two deflections, 6EI/L² couples deflection to rotation, and 4EI/L and 2EI/L are the rotational stiffnesses. Together they form the standard symmetric 4-by-4 matrix.
| Entry | Expression | Couples |
|---|---|---|
| Translational | 12EI/L³ | deflection to deflection |
| Cross | 6EI/L² | deflection to rotation |
| Rotational (direct) | 4EI/L | a node's own rotation |
| Rotational (coupling) | 2EI/L | rotation to the far node |
4.3 Assembling beams
Beam elements assemble like bars, but each shared node now contributes two rows and columns. Continuous beams and frames build up by adding these 4-by-4 matrices at the shared deflection and rotation degrees of freedom.
4.4 The cantilever solution
Clamping one node sets both its deflection and rotation to zero. Solving the reduced 2-by-2 system for the free node returns the exact cantilever results δ = PL³/3EI and θ = PL²/2EI, because the element's cubic shape matches the true deflection for an end load.
4.5 Recovering moments and shear
From the nodal deflections and rotations, the bending moment and shear within an element follow from the second and third derivatives of the deflection. These let bending stress σ = Mc/I be recovered and checked against beam theory.
Engineering connection: combining bar and beam degrees of freedom gives the frame element, and the same Hermite functions appear in the shape-function chapter next.
Worked example 1: the beam stiffness entries
A steel beam element has E = 200 GPa, second moment of area I = 4×10⁶ mm⁴, and length L = 1 m. Compute the four characteristic entries of its stiffness matrix.
- ProblemFind the four stiffness entries for the beam element in Figure 1.
- Given / findE = 200 000 MPa, I = 4×10⁶ mm⁴, L = 1000 mm. Find 12EI/L³, 6EI/L², 4EI/L, 2EI/L.
- AssumptionsEuler-Bernoulli beam; consistent units (N, mm).
- ModelCompute EI, then evaluate each entry.
- EquationsEI = 200 000 × 4×10⁶ = 8×10¹¹ N·mm²entries: 12EI/L³, 6EI/L², 4EI/L, 2EI/L
- Solve12EI/L³ = 12(8×10¹¹)/10⁹ = 9600 N/mm. 6EI/L² = 4.8×10⁶. 4EI/L = 3.2×10⁹. 2EI/L = 1.6×10⁹ (N·mm units for the rotational terms).
- CheckThe translational stiffness 9600 N/mm is far softer than the bar's AE/L would be, as bending should be; the rotational entries are much larger numerically because they carry moment per radian. The 4:2 ratio of the rotational terms is the standard beam signature.
- ConclusionThese four numbers populate the symmetric 4-by-4 element matrix. Their dependence on L (cubed, squared, linear) is why beam stiffness is so length-sensitive.
Worked example 2: a cantilever from one element
The same beam (EI = 8×10¹¹ N·mm², L = 1 m) is clamped at one end and loaded by 1000 N at the free end. Using a single beam element, find the tip deflection and rotation, and compare to beam theory.
- ProblemFind the tip deflection and rotation of the cantilever in Figure 2.
- Given / findEI = 8×10¹¹ N·mm², L = 1000 mm, P = 1000 N. Find δ and θ.
- AssumptionsClamped end (v₁ = θ₁ = 0); single beam element; end load only.
- ModelReduce the 4-by-4 to the free node's 2-by-2 and solve, or use the closed-form results the element reproduces.
- Equationsδ = PL³/3EIθ = PL²/2EI
- Solveδ = 1000(1000)³/(3 × 8×10¹¹) = 10¹²/2.4×10¹² = 0.417 mm. θ = 1000(1000)²/(2 × 8×10¹¹) = 10⁹/1.6×10¹² = 6.25×10⁻⁴ rad.
- CheckThese equal the mechanics-of-materials cantilever formulas exactly, so the single-element FEM and beam theory agree to the digit. No mesh refinement improves them, because the element is already exact for this load.
- ConclusionFor end loads, one beam element is exact, the ideal validation case. Distributed loads need the work-equivalent nodal loads and benefit from more elements.
Misconceptions and diagnostics
| Mistake | Symptom | Diagnostic question | Correction |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dropping rotations | Beam cannot bend correctly | "Does each node have a rotation DOF?" | Keep both v and θ at every beam node. |
| Clamping only the deflection | Cantilever rotates at the wall | "Is the slope fixed too?" | A clamped end fixes both v and θ. |
| Lumping a distributed load at a node | Wrong deflection for UDL | "Did I use work-equivalent nodal loads?" | Convert distributed loads to consistent nodal forces and moments. |
| Mixing unit systems | Entries off by powers of ten | "Are E, I, L all in N and mm?" | Keep EI in N·mm² and L in mm. |
Practice ladder
For EI = 8×10¹¹ N·mm² and L = 2000 mm, find the translational stiffness 12EI/L³.
Show answer
12EI/L³ = 12(8×10¹¹)/(2000)³ = 9.6×10¹²/8×10⁹ = 1200 N/mm, one eighth of the L = 1000 mm value.
The Worked Example 2 cantilever is loaded with 2500 N. What is the tip deflection?
Show answer
δ scales with load: δ = 0.417 × (2500/1000) = 1.04 mm. Linear response.
A cantilever has EI = 5×10¹¹ N·mm², L = 800 mm, P = 600 N. Find the tip deflection.
Show answer
δ = PL³/3EI = 600(800)³/(3 × 5×10¹¹) = 600 × 5.12×10⁸/1.5×10¹² = 3.072×10¹¹/1.5×10¹² = 0.205 mm.
Take a real beam or bracket, model it with beam elements, predict the tip deflection, and state the hand-calc you would validate it against.
What good work looks like
A beam model with deflection and rotation DOF, a predicted deflection, and a closed-form benchmark (PL³/3EI or 5wL⁴/384EI) for validation.
Working with AI, and proving it yourself
Use AI as an examiner, not a solver
Portfolio task
Model a beam with one or more beam elements: form the stiffness, clamp the support, solve for tip deflection and rotation, and validate against the closed-form beam formula.
Retrieval and spaced review
Closed notes. Answer out loud, then reveal.
1. How many DOF does a beam node have?
Two: a transverse deflection v and a rotation θ.
2. Name the four stiffness entries.
12EI/L³, 6EI/L², 4EI/L, and 2EI/L.
3. What does a clamped end fix?
Both the deflection and the rotation at that node.
4. Why is one element exact for a cantilever end load?
The cubic shape function matches the true deflected shape for end loads.
5. How are moments recovered?
From derivatives of the deflection, giving M and then σ = Mc/I.
Textbook mapping
| Item | Mapping |
|---|---|
| Primary source | Logan, A First Course in the Finite Element Method, Chapter 4 (Development of Beam Equations) |
| Cross-reference | Hutton, Ch. 4 · Mechanics of Materials, Ch. 9 |
| Core topics | 4.1 Beam DOF · 4.2 Stiffness matrix · 4.3 Assembly · 4.4 Cantilever solution · 4.5 Moments and shear |
| Engineering connection | Bar plus beam DOF gives the frame element; the Hermite functions return next. |
| Read next | Chapter 5: Shape Functions and Interpolation. |